financial reality

Separating fact from fiction in finance and economics

The Endgame

February 16th, 2009 by reality

In chess, the endgame is when there are few pieces left on the board and no more than fifty moves left to the end of the game. In other words, the end is clearly in sight but not yet resolved.  A chess game can end in only a few ways – checkmate, when one side takes control of the other, and is therefore the victor, a resignation, when one side concedes defeat, or a draw, which usually means that both sides have suffered such losses that neither side appears to be able to gain control.

We are now, in my view, entering the economic endgame for the United States. The black side is the ruling oligarchy of the United States (the “two-party system”) and its various representatives and agencies around the world. The white side is everyone else. Do I exaggerate? I don’t think so. It is an epochal game, the end of an empire. Did you think it would last forever? Empires don’t. Once the empire stops expanding, then it is just a matter of time until the regime is weakened for one reason or another, and then loses control. Let’s look at the top 10 in the empire market share (peak % of world GDP controlled) list for modern times.

Rank Empire World GDP share Peak Year Comment
1 United States 35% 1945 Although weakened by the Cold War and others, the biggest and baddest of all is still very much in business, but past its peak and declining. The decline is accelerating as the regime is being weakened by economic pressures.
2 Qing 32.9% 1820 Weakened by successive rebellions and defeats, the last emperor abdicated in favor of Sun Yat-sen’s Republicans in 1912, ending more than 2000 years of imperial rule.
3 Mughal 24.5% 1700 Weakened by civil wars and agrarian crises, began to decline around 1725, and ended with the last emperor imprisoned by the British in 1857.
4 British 23.8% 1870 Weakened by WWII even though on the winning side, progressively and mostly peacefully dissolved between 1945 and 1965, last vestige, Hong Kong, returned to China in 1997.
5 Russian 9.4% 1913 Weakened by war with the Ottoman empire and social change from the Industrial Revolution,  the Russian and Bolshevik revolutions in 1917 ended the empire.. Arguably succeeded by a Soviet Empire, which, weakened by the Cold War, in turn dissolved with perestroika from 1987.
6 Nazi German 8.3% 1938 The Third Reich fell short of the promised thousand years, and was dissolved by defeat in WWII
7 Japanese 5.8% 1938 Japan still has an emperor, but no empire after being defeated in WWII.
81 French 5.2% 1938 France fought to retain its empire while recovering from occupation in WWII, but it dissolved slowly, in pieces, under De Gaulle, mostly ended with the independence of Algeria in 1962.
9 Austro-Hungarian 3.7% 1913 Disintegrated in 1918 as a result of impending defeat in WWI, leaving what today are the Balkan states, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria and Hungary.
10 Italian Empire 3.1% 1938 Overseas colonies were taken by the Allies in WWII. After its defeat, its monarch abdicated in 1946 and democracy was established. More or less.

The black side has been running the U.S. economy as a Ponzi scheme since domestic savings collapsed along with the end of the Cold War in the mid 1980s. Economic growth since that time has been the result of massive debt, which has grown from approximately 200% of national income to approximately 500%. The black side knows full well (“It’s the economy, stupid”) that its legitimacy is dependent on the economic well-being of the American consumer. Having exhausted the creditworthiness of American consumers and corporations, the black side is now turning to its last resort, the creditworthiness of the dollar and associated sovereign debt. So long as buyers will accept dollars and Treasury debt at high valuations, the black side can continue to attract the new money which is the lifeblood of a Ponzi scheme. Since consumer and corporate spending is hampered by their inability to increase their debt, the government is using that new money to step in, both consuming directly, in their place, and providing them with money to fund their consumption. That is the black queen, the last piece in the game, after that is lost there is no recovery. That is why we are now entering the endgame.

We have recently seen the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme collapse. Even a mainstream “economist” like Paul Krugman realizes that the U.S. is running a Ponzi scheme (“Decade At Bernie’s“), although he does not grasp its origins, causes, extent or history.

By now everyone knows the sad tale of Bernard Madoff’s duped investors. They looked at their statements and thought they were rich. But then, one day, they discovered to their horror that their supposed wealth was a figment of someone else’s imagination.

Unfortunately, that’s a pretty good metaphor for what happened to America as a whole in the first decade of the 21st century.

Like Bernie’s clients, the holders of US debt will end up with nothing. The debt cannot be repaid or serviced, the income just isn’t there. So we know the two possible outcomes are repudiation of the debt – default – or devaluation of the debt through massive inflation – hyperinflation. That brings us to the end of the game. The black side loses. The only question is how long it can delay the inevitable, and that is a question of confidence and credibility that is virtually impossible to answer. How long can the black side continue to entice new money?

In chess, winning or losing is a clear event. In political economy, it is a process without a clear beginning or end, except in retrospect. However, we can enumerate a few “victory conditions” that will enable us to tell that the game is over.

  • Economic restructuring. We can look at the Latin American example for ideas. Potential examples include currency devaluation or reissue, inflation indexing of payments or incomes, soveriegn debt issued in foreign currencies, recourse to the IMF, asset seizures, foreign exchange restrictions, import duties and restrictions, withdrawal from GATA and other free trade agreements, and so forth.
  • Shrinkage of empire. Troops withdrawn from foreign bases, support for regimes withdrawn, reduction or elimination of foreign aid, especially military, cessation of military adventurism, reduction of defense spending and so forth.
  • Institutional restructuring. Much of the fall is due to Federal institutions such as Fannie and Freddie, the Fed and the Treasury department, as well as the privately owned banks and brokers. Major reorganizations and changes here will be an important tell. Nationalization of various industries, especially financial services, is likely. Public agencies will be restructured several times, most likely, as the black side thrashes, but this is a sign of weakness.
  • Political turbulence. At some point, political alternatives will emerge and break the black side’s grip over the country. Hopefully, the alternatives will be peaceful, but, as the precedents suggest, this is far from a given. “Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown,” as the bard observed.
  • Economic normalization. The game is really over when the economy assumes a healthy profile, if even at a very low level of economic activity. That means savings of 10% of GDP, or more, without substantial state deficits, positive real interest rates and a stable currency.

In the meantime, our challenge is to navigate the rocks, shallows and whirlpools between here and there. Good luck.

Posted in Economics, Government, Inflation & The Dollar, Manias, Rogues and Rascals, Strategy & Scenarios, The Economy | 2 Comments »

2 Responses

  1. Keith Says:

    reality, you’re a gifted writer and are obviously a thoughtful and erudite person. Thanks for sharing your insights on this blog.

    I’ve been thinking quite a bit about the theory that WWII ended the Great Depression. I don’t refute this idea, but I believe that – at least for the United States – it was a special case. We were neutral for over two years before entering the fray, and the armaments trade certainly lifted our economy out of the doldrums. But only at the expense of the British Empire. Recall Churchill’s complaint that “We are not only to be skinned, but flayed to the bone”. On one occasion the U.S. sent a destroyer to South Africa to pick up literally tons of the Empire’s gold. Once the British were out of ready cash, we came up with ‘Lend Lease’. And so on. The point is that it took the transfer of wealth from a very large and powerful empire to end our economic malaise then; the situation is quite different now, and people would do well to remember this.

  2. reality Says:

    Thanks for he nice words. Well in one sense, it’s a fact. After the war, the depression was over and growth was strong. The question is, what was the mechanism? The Keynesians might say it was all that spending. In my opinion, it was the constraints on consumption and the psychology of a common cause. After the war, people continued saving and so the economy grew. But your observation that the US was strengthened at the expense of the British Empire is interesting, that may well have moderated the debilitating effects of war spending and help explain the different trajectories of the US and Britain after the war. Thanks for the thought.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.