financial reality

Separating fact from fiction in finance and economics


Archives:

Meta:

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

About Me:

  • InLibrisLibertas
    Location : Mill Valley, California, United States

    I'm an independent investor. I make my living from the returns on my investments. I work at home, in the northern part of the San Francisco Bay area. I spent most of my career as an executive in high-tech, although I also spent time in banking. Down to one kid in university now!

Page 16

August 8th, 2008 by reality

Don Coxe has always said that the news that is worth trading is on page 16, not the front page. Today’s page 16 news that could have serious consequences is the outbreak of fighting between Russia and Georgia. The Belfast Telegraph:

A convoy of Russian tanks and troops is reportedly moving toward South Ossetia’s capital as Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin declares ‘the war has started’.

Tech stocks are being jammed today, well, because they can be. Ostensibly, because the price of oil is falling. I suppose it is dumb to point out that tech stocks have rallied anyway since oil broke out above 100 in March. However, this kind of violent action has a tendency to feed on itself, as over-leveraged players blow up or are forced to liquidate positions by margin calls. Watch out, as usual.

My suspicion is that the collapse of commodities is the beginning of the end. It shows that the liquidity crunch and economic slowdown have gone global.

Posted in Commodities, Don Coxe, Energy, International, Technology |

3 Responses

  1. Red Brian Says:

    There is still 3.5 trillion dollars sitting in cash that hasn’t been lost yet so place your bets in the “Cash is King” or “Cash is Trash” sweepstakes.

    And, no, you can’t sit this hand out.

  2. James Dailey Says:

    The entire “cash on the sidelines” argument is so simplistic and wrongheaded. What happens if all of that cash were put into the stock market? It all depends! The amount of securities owned will not change - it is the appetite of buyers versus sellers on each side of the equation that determines price.

    So if $3.5 trillion came out of money markets in an aggressive fashion, what happens to interest rates? Who funds the growing need for debt at the corporate, local,state and federal level? What impact would higher rates have on equity valuations? What about the economy and over leveraged consumer?

    If that money would moved into stocks, it is reasonable to believe it could drive prices higher but not necessarily. If the aggressiveness of sellers was stronger than that of buyers, then the money could be “burned up”, as prices stabilize or spike temporarily while it absorbs the supply - only to drop eventually.

  3. Gigi Says:

    Aren’t there two sides to every transaction, a seller for every buyer?

    Money market accounts are not money. They are money like assets which must be sold to someone else to be converted into money to buy something.

    Its all a big game of musical chairs….

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.